High Performance Housing, the new guidebook by Barbara Miller and Bob Corbett, condenses their applied research and construction experience in cold-climate high performance housing.

This detailed publication explains the new High Performance Housing that is the heart of the "High Performance Housing Partnership" (HP2) home certification program, which encourages utilities to buy conservation savings at the time of new construction, these methods have more than 20 years of field experience. These homes easily meet and exceed the new Energy Star standards for new home construction, and they save 20 percent more than minimum Energy Star. The homes also meet Healthy Home guidelines. The publication is aimed at homebuyers, as well as housing professionals.

The authors are co-founders of the National Affordable Housing Network, a grass-roots effort aimed at bringing the benefits of sustainable building to very low income households, who need it most. The home features are aimed at saving costs for consumers both in energy and health expenses. The authors have been working together for 20 years, and with their national network for more than 20 years.
 
High Performance Housing contains 62 pages of text and 40 detailed graphics designed to explain the construction techniques and measures used with the National Affordable Housing Network's award-winning cold-climate houseplans.

To order your copy of
High Performance Housing, send a check or money order for $24.95 for each copy (includes postage and handling) to National Affordable Housing Network, P.O. Box 3706, Butte, MT 59702.

You can also order with a purchase order by sending a fax to
406-782-5168.

Also, you can request that a copy be sent with an invoice by sending an e-mail message to us at
info@nahn.com.
 
EXCERPT:

Figure 1: Map showing where this technology is applicable

The recommendations in this publication apply to areas shown on this map, as far as energy cost effectiveness. There are also health-related reasons for using this technology. While not on the map, the cold climate area extends to Canada and Alaska, where heating system capacity can be increased to meet any additional demands. More than 2,000 homes have been built using these approaches in the Unites States, with many more in Canada and Sweden. Heating cost increases since 1982 have made the approach cost effective to a larger region of the nation.
 
This approach may also be warranted beyond this climate zone IF:
  • Energy costs are quite high, or
  • Residents are elderly or need higher indoor temperatures in the heating season, or
  • Residents have respiratory health issues or want the ability to filter outdoor air, or
  • Residents are smokers
  • Residents want "safe room" air quality features for security reasons, or
  • Energy prices are uncertain in your region, or
  • Sound control is desirable
Figure 2: Leaky Bucket

The energy savings measures in a house can be compared to plugging the leaks in a leaky bucket. Minimum property standards create quite a "leaky" bucket, and new standards by EPA Energy Star save 30 percent over this level.

NAHN's approach is designed to save 50 percent over minimum property standards, in addition to providing an advanced ventilation and air quality system with other consumer benefits.
The savings from the NAHN approach range from $350 to $1,000 a year, depending on climate zone and personal preferences. The final heating and cooling cost is very dependent on the setting on the thermostat. Each degree difference translates into a REAL increase in cost.




Figure 3: Historic Natural Gas Price Hikes

Since 1980, natural gas costs to consumers have nearly doubled. The question of how high energy costs will be in the future is always an issue. By using the NAHN approach, the consumer can be assured that the most is being done that is possible to provide for a secure energy future, no matter what happens to energy prices.
 
 
 
 
 
 
Figure 4: Comparing Approaches

The minimum standards approach usually has an adequate building envelope and a large, ducted space conditioner. Ventilation is primarily through pressurization when the space conditioner is on and through wind-driven cracks and leaks when the space conditioner is off.

The NAHN cold-climate approach
 
The NAHN approach puts the investment in the building envelope, which is a lifetime investment, and reduces the space conditioner to a small size appropriate to the very small heating or cooling load. Ductwork is still present, but rather than being part of the heating system, it is used to move ventilation air, which can be filtered, and which offers the possibility of heat recovery.
 

Figure 5: Economics of Energy and Health Benefits with Investment in Building Shell versus System

The investment in both cases may be similar, but the final operation costs are dramatically different.

Greater Comfort for the Money
- Research conducted by the engineering community has proven that higher radiant surface temperatures and cooler air temperatures make for greater productivity, comfort, and health in the workplace. At home, this combination can provide greater comfort levels at much lower thermostat settings. This is how an adequately sized single point source of heat is code approvable in very cold climates to heat the entire NAHN single story home. With warmer indoor surface radiant temperatures, it is desirable to have cooler air temperatures.

Health Benefits May Provide Further Returns on Investment. - Another benefit is controlled balanced mechanical ventilation.This provides a freshness and air quality that is unmatched with conventional construction techniques. Avoidance of toxics during construction and use of non-polluting flooring will also help to prevent building-related respiratory problems.

Construction Costs - A much smaller heating system's cost offsets greater amounts of investment in the lifetime energy features of the building shell - windows, walls, ceilings, floors, doors, and a controlled energy recovery ventilation system. The "extra" costs for most builders will total less than $2,500 in homes under 1,500 square feet.

Measured Energy Savings - With an energy savings of at least $400 a year over MEC 95, for example, in an 7,500 heating degree day climate, this investment has an annual rate of return of 16 percent, with a simple total payback of less than seven years. Measured results show that heat is provided through Solar Energy (20 percent), Space Heater (25 percent) and "internal gains and heat recovery" (55 percent).

Cold-climate houseplans || Plan 901 || Plan 1092 || Plan 1092A || Plan 1288 || Hot-climate houseplans || Plan 1045H ||
Houses for Butte
|| Texas HP2 Project || Central Butte Neighborhood || Montana Superinsulation Project || 
Who We Are
 
|| Our Favorite Links